Study plan / research proposal

What it is and how long it must be

The CSC requires a study plan (Master's) or research proposal (PhD) of at least 800 words for postgraduate applicants, written in the program's language of instruction. Most competitive plans run 800-1,500 words.

The study plan (for Master's applicants) or research proposal (for PhD applicants) is the heart of your application - it is where the committee decides whether you have a real, thought-through reason to study your subject in China, or whether you are just chasing free tuition. The CSC requires a study plan of at least 800 words for postgraduate applicants; most competitive plans run 800-1,500 words. Undergraduate applicants usually write a shorter study plan, but the same principles of specificity and clarity apply.

Write it in the language of instruction of your program (usually English), keep the formatting clean and professional, and make sure your name and target program appear at the top.

A structure template that works

Use a clear 7-part structure the committee can scan at a glance: (1) background and motivation, (2) why China and why this university or professor, (3) research objectives and questions, (4) methodology, (5) semester-by-semester timeline, (6) expected outcomes, and (7) career plan after return.

Use a clear, logical structure the committee can follow at a glance. The 7-part template below is what most successful CSC study plans follow, in order.

(1) Background & motivation, who you are academically and what drew you to this field.

(2) Why China & why this university/professor, specific reasons tied to strengths, labs, or a named supervisor.

(3) Research objectives & questions, what exactly you want to investigate.

(4) Methodology, how you will approach it (methods, data, tools).

(5) Timeline by semester, a realistic plan mapping your study or research across the program's semesters.

(6) Expected outcomes, what you hope to produce or contribute.

(7) Career plan after return, how this degree fits your future, ideally with a note on returning to serve your home country.

The 'why this university and professor' section is what separates strong plans from generic ones. Name the research group, cite a relevant project or paper, and connect it to your objectives. A committee can instantly tell the difference between a plan written for them and a plan copy-pasted across ten applications.

Master's study plan vs. PhD research proposal

A Master's study plan is broader, it can propose a research direction without committing to a specific project. A PhD research proposal must define a specific research problem, briefly review the literature, and lay out a credible methodology and expected original contribution.

A Master's study plan is broader: it emphasises your motivation, the courses and skills you want to gain, and how the program advances your career. It can propose a research direction without committing to a fully specified project.

A PhD research proposal is narrower and more rigorous: it must define a specific research problem, review the relevant literature briefly, state clear research questions or hypotheses, and lay out a credible methodology and expected original contribution. Reviewers and your prospective supervisor will judge whether the project is feasible and whether it fits their group's expertise, so align it closely with the supervisor you contacted in Step 2.

Plagiarism warning

Never copy your study plan from online templates, AI-generated samples, or another applicant's file. Universities check for plagiarism, and a copied plan (or one that reads as machine-generated with no personal specifics) is a fast rejection.

Do not copy your study plan from online samples, templates you paste verbatim, or another applicant. Universities do check for plagiarism, and a plan that is copied - or that reads as though an AI wrote it with no personal specifics - is a fast route to rejection. Use templates and examples only as a scaffold; every sentence about your motivation, your objectives and your chosen supervisor must be genuinely yours.

Five weaknesses that get plans rejected

Study plans most often get rejected for five weaknesses: being generic, having no clear research question, showing no connection to the specific university or supervisor, proposing an unrealistic scope, and being poorly written or unstructured.

The same five weaknesses turn up in most rejected plans. Fix these and yours will already be ahead of most applicants:

1. Being generic, a plan that could be sent to any university with the name swapped.

2. No clear research question or objective, the reader cannot tell what you actually intend to do.

3. No connection to the specific university or supervisor.

4. Unrealistic scope, proposing to 'solve climate change' in a two-year Master's signals inexperience; a focused, achievable question signals maturity.

5. Poor language and structure, typos, walls of text, and no headings make even good ideas look weak.